The first term covered two things: posting podcast teasers, and helping the Champions Network with its marketing. The first was defined. The second never was — and it became an Academy platform. This document sets out what that work turned into, what it would have cost commissioned conventionally, and three ways to resource the year ahead.
Every item below is live and inspectable today. Comparable costs are market estimates for equivalent scope commissioned on its own — not competing quotes.
| Deliverable | Comparable cost |
|---|---|
| Marketing siteVideo hero, six-section narrative, leadership modals, scroll animation, full brand system, responsive throughout | $7,500 |
| Four interactive study guidesSessions 001–004 — custom audio player, tabbed readings, accordions, go-deeper modals, ten-question quizzes, embedded video. Closer to small web apps than pages | $4,800 |
| Print brochures — four editionsTwo full art directions of the 8-page, plus the 4-page and the 2-page conference handout; all print-ready | $4,000 |
| 2027 March for Life planning guide8-page print PDF and a responsive web edition generated from one source | $2,500 |
| Chapter publicity kit — Boulder, COPoster, two-audience half-sheet handouts, two social formats, QR, RSVP landing page — and the template system behind them | $2,800 |
| Champions Advocate Weekly workstreamAI concept mockup, on-site digest demo with click-through approval flow, and the email-delivery platform analysis | $2,000 |
| Internal toolingGated admin area, build log, correspondence archive, and the live Clockify budget dashboard (serverless) | $2,000 |
| Liberty Action Alert podcast pageFour-part series — players, tabs, accordions, promotional section | $1,200 |
| Brand standards — guide + web referencePalette, type system, logo usage; Markdown source plus a browsable reference page | $1,500 |
| Total comparable value | ≈ $25,300 |
Method: each line is the low-to-middle of the going rate an independent designer or developer would quote for that deliverable commissioned on its own. The estimate excludes discovery workshops, copywriting rounds and dedicated QA that an agency bills separately — so it reads conservative.
On August 5 the office asked for publicity for a new chapter at University Lutheran Chapel in Boulder — a poster, some handouts, a social post. Two days later the chapter had all of it, plus something that was not requested.
Chapter publicity used to be a bespoke design job priced per chapter. It is now a repeatable build. When the Missouri group starts — and Rev. Frith expects it shortly — their full kit costs roughly an hour rather than a week. Every chapter after Boulder is cheaper than the one before it.
The copy also answered the question Pastor Jarvis could not resolve on his own. His chapter is hosted by students who cannot sustain it alone, so the material invites neighbouring congregations to come for the students first and for their own training second — a distinction that decides whether adults show up at all.
The value here is not that software writes things. It is that the expensive part of producing serious material — design, layout, print preparation, page building, video assembly — has fallen close to zero, while the part that was always scarce stays scarce.
It's not what the AI generates. It's how we reduce the cost of expertise — the stuff that has been expensive and hard to produce. If you've got people who can really talk, that's all they have to be able to do.Gary Ricke · weekly check-in, July 31 2026
That is the whole operating model. Rev. Frith records a lecture; the structured session page, the quiz, the discussion guide and the drip email are derived from it. Dr. Seltz records a podcast; the page, the thumbnail, the summary and the transcript follow automatically. The office sends a chapel photo and ten dates; a full publicity kit comes back.
The Network's scarce resource is theological judgement and the trust of congregations. Everything downstream of that is now production, and production is what this engagement has been converting from a cost into an asset.
Figures below are pulled live from the project time log, not estimated.
To be explicit about cause: the agreement covered two things — posting podcast teasers, and helping the Champions Network with its marketing. The first was clearly defined and has been delivered every month of the term. The second was never scoped. There was no deliverable list, no boundary, and no share of the sixty hours set aside for it. The hours were sized against the podcast work.
What the marketing half became — requested and approved week by week in the check-ins — was a marketing site, a four-session Academy pilot, four print brochures, a planning guide, an email programme, an internal admin system, and a chapter publicity kit. No one over-reached. There was simply no scope line to measure any of it against.
The pace has been consistent throughout — between ten and sixteen hours a month, every month. The mismatch is entirely definitional. The purpose of this proposal is to close that gap: to scope the marketing side explicitly, for the first time, so that both sides know what a month is expected to contain.
These are not proposals invented for this document — each one is already on the shared to-do list, requested by Rev. Frith in a check-in.
Publicity kits and RSVP pages for each new chapter, on the Boulder template. Missouri is next; Rev. Frith expects the pattern to repeat through the year as groups form.
Live now · scales cheaplyRev. Frith records a 30–50 minute lecture per lesson; it becomes a structured session page with chapters, discussion guide, quiz and glossary. Year 1 is re-recorded from Lesson 1 starting September.
Largest single blockMembership shell, admin backend, Stripe subscriptions with coupon codes, gift subscriptions. Currently blocked pending the accountants' decision on which account receives revenue.
Blocked on LCMS financeMove from demo to live: the send path on Resend, source permission requests and attribution handling, and surfacing stories on the site rather than only in email.
Plan complete, build pendingDrip onboarding, completion tracking, weekly "here's what's next" emails, and the rewards concept — champion coins, badges, or discounted Year 2 for finishing Year 1.
Designed, not builtWritten process documentation so a staff member or intern can run the production workflow end to end. Requested explicitly as a safeguard against single-person dependency.
Risk reductionDr. Seltz's transition lands inside this window. If he continues producing the Liberty Action Alert in a reduced capacity, the automation described above is what makes that feasible at a fraction of the current effort — the production cost of each episode falls to editing and posting, both of which are already largely automated.
Each option below does the thing the original agreement never did: it puts a defined size on the marketing side. All three continue at the current $100/hour rate, which is materially below the market rate for this work and is not proposed to change. The only variable is volume — and therefore how much of the list above actually gets built.
Honest assessment: this holds ground. The Academy, payments and email programme would not proceed.
Matches the workstreams Rev. Frith has already committed to for September. This is the option sized to what has actually been asked for.
Appropriate if the board intends the Academy to carry subscription revenue within the coming year.
Unused hours in any month carry forward within the term. Work outside the agreed scope is quoted separately before it starts, never billed as a surprise. Either party may end the agreement with 30 days' notice.
This has been the most interesting client work I do, and I would like to keep doing it. The Network is at the point where the groundwork stops being groundwork and starts compounding — Boulder is the first clear instance of that, and there will be more. What the year needs is an agreement sized to the work that is actually being requested, so that neither the Network nor I are guessing month to month.