Working Agenda · Live Page

Friday, August 21

One meeting today · 11:00 with Mark and Carly

This page stays live and gets updated as items close, so you can come back to it any time rather than digging through email. Refresh to see the latest. Items marked green are done; dashed gold means we’re waiting on someone.

0 of 0 complete
Last updated Fri, Aug 21 · 10:55 a.m. CDT
Maintenance retainer · Mar 1 – Aug 31, 2026

Time used against budget

Reading Clockify…
hours used
of 60
billed at $100/hr
of $6,000
60 hr · $6,000 budget
average per month, against the 10 hr / month the retainer assumed
projected total at Aug 31 on this month’s pace
left in the retainer period, and today’s two meetings aren’t logged yet

Month by month, and where the hours went

Live from Clockify, covering the two LCRL projects the retainer pays for. In-period only — nothing before Mar 1, 2026 is counted.

Background and history are tucked into the grey bars — open only what you need.
11:00

Champions Weekly Check-In

Mark, Carly, Gary · Zoom · one hour
Boulder is answered — all three points, already built Pastor Jarvis reviewed the kit, “really liked” the materials, and came back with three considerations. All three are done and rebuilt this morning — including the wording conundrum he asked us to solve, which is fixed in the template rather than in Boulder, so every chapter after this one inherits it. The only thing left is sending it back to him, and their first session is Thursday, September 10.

1 · Boulder — Pastor Jarvis’s three points

  • The wording conundrum — what do we call everyone who isn’t a student? Solved and rebuilt
    Nobody is sorted by age any more — they’re sorted by where they come from. “Neighbors” where it has to be short, “members of neighboring congregations” where it has to be exact. That answers all three of his constraints at once: undergrads are never told they aren’t adults, there is no young-versus-older split, and nothing is anchored on a word that shuts out a sixteen-year-old.

    The word “adults” is now gone from the kit entirely — four phrases, nine places, all fixed in the template rather than in Boulder, so every chapter after this one is born correct. High schoolers are named outright in the audience line under the QR code.
  • “Select Thursdays” on the piece that doesn’t list the dates Done
    He was right, and it was exactly one piece — the social square, the only thing in the kit that gave a day without a calendar under it. It now reads “Select Thursdays · 7:00 PM · From Sept 10.” The poster and both handouts print all ten dates, so they were already unambiguous and are untouched.

    Built as a template rule rather than a Boulder edit: a chapter that really does meet every week just leaves the new field out and still says plain “Thursdays.”
  • The student handout isn’t missing — it’s page 2 Answered, and repackaged
    It already exists, and it already says what he expected it to say. The handouts PDF is two pages: page 1 is the congregations version, page 2 is the students version, and page 2 carries “Hold your ground. You don’t have to hold it alone” — the same line as the social portrait, exactly as he guessed. Nothing needs writing.

    What actually went wrong is delivery: one file, two audiences, and he printed the first page. Worse, both download buttons on our own chapter-kit page handed over the same file — so the way we shipped it practically guaranteed this.

    Fixed. Each audience now has its own PDF — Handout — Congregations and Handout — Students — with the combined two-page file kept at its original name so anything already forwarded still opens.
  • The revised kit is ready — Carly just has to send it Carly · today if possible
    Everything above is rebuilt and live on the chapter-kit page; Boulder is holding a kit that is now out of date. First session is Thursday, September 10, and Mark speaks at the ULC conference on September 19 where Jarvis hopes to pick up more members — possibly whole new chapters. Sending today gives them two clear weeks to print and get it round the neighboring congregations before the first session rather than after it. Worth telling Pr. Jarvis plainly that all three of his points were taken.

2 · Where everything else stands

  • Board packet material for Mark Critical path · board meets in about a week
    Accounting cleared the Academy subscription; nothing gets built until the LCRL board approves at the end of August. That is now next week, and this packet is the thing that feeds it. Two questions for Mark today: what date is the board meeting, and what form does he want this in — a couple of slides that drop into his own presentation, or a standalone one-pager to hand round the table?
  • St. Stephen Liberty — they meet at the end of this month Now the tight one
    Last Friday this was “end of the month.” That is now inside two weeks, and we still have no dates, no contact and no photo. The kit itself takes about a day once the inputs land — but not from nothing. Worth one call from Mark today rather than another week of waiting on a chapter that keeps restarting because people keep joining.
  • Doctrinal Review — can they approve a page instead of a PDF? Mark asked · the week is up
    Mark said he’d ask and expected about a week for an answer. That week has passed — any word? If the answer is no, nothing is lost and the PDF path stays; but knowing either way lets the production workflow be written down properly rather than left with a hole in step four.
  • Carly’s Mailchimp export Arrived — thank you, Carly
    Came through the same afternoon as last week’s call. That was the last thing holding up the Advocate Weekly restart — the master list gets built from it, and once subscribers are off Mailchimp the $20 a month can be cancelled. Now on Gary.
  • Shelly — Cloudflare verification, and the last source permissions A week, no reply
    The reminder went out last Friday morning with what to search for and where to click. Nothing back since. Neither item is urgent on its own, but both have now been open long enough to be worth a nudge from Mark rather than another email from Gary. On permissions: most sources said yes, a couple simply haven’t replied, and nobody has balked.
  • Where do the Mom & Pop Papers live — and how big is the LAA archive? Asked last week · still unanswered
    Neither is anywhere Gary can reach. We hold four LAA episodes, all four about the Network itself — enough to pair with Session 001 and nothing else. This blocks a step Mark himself put in the workflow, so it needs either an archive or a decision to drop the step.

3 · Shipped since last Friday

  • Liberty Action Alert — Lorcán Price, “Convicted for Conscience” Live Wednesday
    Built and sent for review Wednesday morning; approved by Mark — “looks great. Post it!” — and by Dr. Seltz the same day, and posted Wednesday afternoon. Start to live inside eight hours.
  • Pastor Jarvis’s feedback — found, read, worked through Closed out
    Last Friday this was “it arrived and Gary missed it.” It has now been read in full, all three points are answered above, and — the part that matters for the next chapter — two of the three fixes belong in the template rather than in Boulder, which is the whole reason the kit was templatized before the second chapter rather than after it.
Last Friday, in one paragraph
  • LCMS accounting said yes. LCRL gets its own Stripe account, transaction codes keep subscriptions and gifts apart, deposits arrive net, setup is about an hour plus bank verification. Creation waits on the board.
  • The session workflow got settled. Mark scripts from Dr. Seltz’s material, records one take to Zoom cloud when he does record, Gary builds the session, Doctrinal Review takes batches of three or four.
  • Every session page gets two modes — studying alone, or leading a group — with about thirty minutes of each chapter meeting spent on how to engage the community.
  • Mark stays on his LCRL address. A Champions-Network mailbox isn’t necessary; mail to Mark@champions-network.com already reaches him.
  • The scope proposal raised no questions. It lives at /proposal, and the forwardable print version at /proposal.pdf.

Transcript filed as plan/sources/2026-08-14-transcript-weekly-checkin.txt

AFTER

Build Queue

Work that isn’t already on the agenda above — nothing here is counted twice
  • Board packet material Critical path
    The architecture, what gets built and what it costs — written for a board, not for engineers. Everything Stripe-shaped waits behind it.
  • Boulder kit, revision 2 Built this morning
    Wording swapped in the template, “Select Thursdays” on the social square, handouts split per audience, and poster, handouts, social and /boulder all re-rendered — every layout clean. Everything is on /chapters to download. Most of it landed in the template, so the next chapter starts from the corrected version.
  • Advocate Weekly — master list from Carly’s export Unblocked
    Import the segment export, build the master list, verify the counts against Mailchimp, then cancel the $20/month.
  • Attribution line into the Advocate template Condition of every permission
    Every source that said yes said yes on condition of proper attribution — a “provided by [source]” credit with a link back where we have one. That belongs in the template so it is applied identically every issue rather than remembered every issue.
  • Session Production Workflow one-pager Living document
    Mark’s six steps written down, plus a status board in the admin area so anyone can see which session sits at which step. Written now with the Doctrinal Review question still open, and updated when the answer lands.
  • Session template — individual / group toggle Gary builds
    Goes into the template once, so every session from here carries it at no extra cost per session. The group view surfaces the discussion guide, prompts and questions over the same material.
  • Session template — mobile first, not mobile tolerated Gary
    Someone studying in bed on a phone, and someone holding a phone in a circle of people running the discussion. That is the primary device.
  • Rotating discussion leader Idea to prove
    Borrowed from F3. The page guides whoever is leading, so a different member can take it each month instead of one person always running it. Beta test it on Boulder once they are meeting.
  • Zoom cloud handoff instructions Small
    One page for Mark: record to cloud, send the link, Gary pulls it down and clears it so Zoom storage doesn’t creep.
  • Stripe subscription build Gated on the board
    Accounting cleared it. Build begins once the board approves and Gary is invited onto the LCRL Stripe account as a developer.
  • Log this meeting to the Status build log End of day
Nothing here yet No items in that state right now — try another filter.

The wording fix, as built

This is shipped, not proposed. Every swap below is live in the template and in the rebuilt Boulder pieces as of this morning.

He set three constraints at once, which is why it read like a knot:

  • Undergrads are adults — calling only the congregation members “adults” quietly says they aren’t.
  • “Young adults” against “older adults” is the same mistake with extra words.
  • He wants high schoolers to consider the training, so anything anchored on adult pushes them out of the frame.
The move: stop sorting people by age, sort them by where they come from

The real distinction in that room isn’t old and young. It’s the students who host and the neighbors who come. That is true of everyone present, it says nothing about anyone’s age, and it’s the thing Pastor Jarvis actually wants to communicate — that turning up is a service to the students. The poster already talks this way in its subhead: “the students who host it are asking their neighbors to sit at the table with them.” So this isn’t a new voice, it’s finishing the one the piece already has.

The exact swaps

The word appeared in four phrases across nine places. All of them lived in the template or the chapter file, so fixing them there fixed every chapter after Boulder too.

PosterAdults from neighboring congregations are what make it hold.” → “Members of neighboring congregations are what make it hold.”
Handouts & landing “Be the adults who show up every time…” → “Be the ones who show up every time, so the students are never the only ones in the room.”
Handouts & landing “bring adults from area churches with you” → “bring members of area congregations with you”
Student handout & socialadults from around Boulder standing beside you” → “neighbors from around Boulder standing beside you”
And one line to bring the high schoolers in

The audience is already stated in the fine print under the QR code. It just needs three words:

Was: “Open to University of Colorado students and to members of neighboring Lutheran congregations.”

Now: “Open to University of Colorado students, high schoolers, and members of neighboring Lutheran congregations.”
On “is congregational member too bulky?”

Yes for a headline, no for the fine print — so use both, in the places each one fits. “Neighbors” where it has to be short and warm; “members of neighboring congregations” where it has to be exact. Nobody has to read the bulky version to understand the invitation, and nobody who needs the precise version is left guessing.

One more, while we’re here

The two handouts were named adult and student internally, which is how the word got into the conversation in the first place. They are now Congregations and Students — in the file names, on the download buttons and in the admin page — because that is where wording leaks back in after it has been fixed on the artwork.

Pastor Jarvis’s feedback, in full

Carly forwarded it on August 13, copying his message whole so nothing got lost in the summarizing. Her framing: “Pastor Jarvis has reviewed the materials and really liked them.”

On the dates

“I copied one of the posters for the Mission Society, and it was the one that simply said ‘Thursdays.’ For that one, could you say, ‘Select Thursdays’ as I see all the other ones have all the dates.”

On the wording

“I was speaking to some of our newest alumni and referred to them as adults, and they gave me a little pushback when they referred to the undergrads also as adults. I might refer to undergrads as ‘young adults,’ but we can’t distinguish between the students and the congregational members as ‘young adults’ and ‘older adults.’ Is ‘congregation member’ or ‘congregational member’ too bulky? I thought about ‘adult congregational member,’ but I would also like to see HS kids consider this training. Do you have a wording solution for this conundrum?”

“As you can tell, these are not major considerations, but I’m wondering if the second one has a good resolution. Seeing what you have already done, I’m convinced you’ll find the perfect solution.”

On the handouts

“I just noticed that the adult handout and the student handout are the same document. Was the student handout, split into half pages, supposed to say something along the lines of ‘Hold your ground. You don’t have to hold it alone’ the same as the social portrait?”

He guessed the line correctly, word for word — because it is already there, on page 2. That is a good sign about the kit and a bad sign about shipping two audiences in one PDF.
Worth remembering from his original brief

The reason this chapter can’t be students-only, in his words: “a student’s schedule is frequently beyond their control… that’s likely to be only a handful, and when a couple of those don’t show up, it’s easy for the others to become demoralized.” Every piece of copy in the kit is built on that sentence — which is why the wording for who else is in the room matters more here than it would anywhere else.

Letting Doctrinal Review approve a page

Step 4 is the one gate nobody on our side controls, and today it stayed that way. Two things came out of the conversation — one settled, one worth chasing.

Settled: send them in batches

Mark’s standing approach is to give Doctrinal Review three or four sessions at a time. If the queue takes as long as it takes, batching stops that from becoming a delay on every single session — it becomes one delay per batch.

Worth chasing: could they review the page itself?

Today the flow is: Gary makes a PDF → Mark emails it → a reviewer downloads it, marks it up, writes an email back. Every one of those steps is friction that has nothing to do with doctrine. A review link instead would mean:

  • Opens on a phone or a computer, nothing to download
  • Approve with a button, or type notes inline against the part in question
  • Possibly record a spoken note, for a reviewer who’d rather talk than type
  • No email to compose, no file to keep track of, no version to reconcile afterwards

It also fixes a quieter problem: with a PDF, approved changes have to be applied twice — once to the document and once to the live page. If the page is what gets reviewed, they can’t drift apart.

Mark will ask, and expects about a week for an answer. He can’t ask the reviewers directly — they’re anonymous by design. His read: the younger ones would welcome it, the older ones are an unknown. Worth framing the ask as fewer steps for them rather than as new technology.

If the answer is no, nothing is lost — the PDF path already works and stays. This only ever removes friction where they’re willing to have it removed.

Pairing an LAA episode with each session

This one is Mark’s idea, not ours — which is why it reads unfamiliar. It’s his own line in Wednesday’s email: “Gary might AI Compute which LAA Podcast might be a complementary resource and suggested extra experience per the session.”
What LAA is

Liberty Action Alert — the LCRL podcast Dr. Seltz hosts. We already built a page around one series of it: four episodes from August 2023 in which Dr. Seltz interviews Mark about the Champions Network. They’re on the site now with players, transcripts and pull-quotes.

  • Part 1 — What Is the Champions Network? (Aug 9, 2023)
  • Part 2 — Why Now? The Case for Organizing (Aug 16)
  • Part 3 — Standing in the Gap (Aug 23)
  • Part 4 — How to Join & What to Expect (Aug 30)
What Mark is proposing

That every Academy session carries an optional “go deeper” listen alongside its Mom & Pop Paper reading. The session teaches the topic; the episode lets a student hear Dr. Seltz and Mark talking through the same ground in conversation, which lands differently from a lecture. Since the transcripts already exist, matching an episode to a session topic is quick and cheap — that’s the “AI compute” part, and it’s the easy bit.

The catch worth raising
We only have four episodes, and all four are about the Network itself. They pair naturally with Session 001 — the introduction — and with very little else. There’s nothing here to match against a session on, say, parental rights or two-kingdom citizenship in the schools.

LAA is an ongoing LCRL program, so there is almost certainly a far bigger back catalogue that simply hasn’t been shared with us. The question for Mark: how many LAA episodes exist, and where do they live? With a real archive this step is genuinely valuable and costs almost nothing per session. With four episodes it runs dry immediately, and we should either drop it from the workflow or reduce it to a one-off pointer on the introductory session.

Still open Waiting on someone Done

Champions Network working agenda. Maintained by Gary Ricke, Orbis Design — updated as items close, so this link stays good all week. Questions or a correction: gary.ricke@orbisdesign.com

Champions Network

Internal Document

This page is password protected.